He Is wrote:

Slide Away wrote: Yeah Oasis without Noel is like The Beatles without one of them like John Lennon. Quite agree with you here.

me 2, a perfect way to explain it.

every band has a center that if it loses it the level of the music will go down, and for Oasis noel is that center.

_________________
"We the people fight for our existence
We don't claim to be perfect
But we're free
We dream our dreams alone
With no resistance
Fading like the stars we wish to be..."

The album might be good without Noel, but 1) there's no way that they can call themselves Oasis without him, 2) it definitely wouldn't be as lyrically strong (for obvious reasons), and 3) it wouldn't be as musically strong in my opinion - Noel is an underrated guitarist.

_________________
"So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past."

sbhammer wrote:

The album might be good without Noel, but 1) there's no way that they can call themselves Oasis without him, 2) it definitely wouldn't be as lyrically strong (for obvious reasons), and 3) it wouldn't be as musically strong in my opinion - Noel is an underrated guitarist.

I disagree I think musically it would be brilliant...and they could bring Zak back to do it with them.....then it couldn't be faulted

_________________

Whats The Story? wrote:

sbhammer wrote: The album might be good without Noel, but 1) there's no way that they can call themselves Oasis without him, 2) it definitely wouldn't be as lyrically strong (for obvious reasons), and 3) it wouldn't be as musically strong in my opinion - Noel is an underrated guitarist. I disagree I think musically it would be brilliant...and they could bring Zak back to do it with them.....then it couldn't be faulted

why? what dose zak has to do with any thing, don't get me wrong Zak is great, but Oasis where great before him and they will be great after him.
and I don't think he wrote any song lyrics for songs (cuz if he did we would have seen it in DOYS)

_________________
"We the people fight for our existence
We don't claim to be perfect
But we're free
We dream our dreams alone
With no resistance
Fading like the stars we wish to be..."

bigM wrote:

Whats The Story? wrote: sbhammer wrote: The album might be good without Noel, but 1) there's no way that they can call themselves Oasis without him, 2) it definitely wouldn't be as lyrically strong (for obvious reasons), and 3) it wouldn't be as musically strong in my opinion - Noel is an underrated guitarist. I disagree I think musically it would be brilliant...and they could bring Zak back to do it with them.....then it couldn't be faulted why? what dose zak has to do with any thing, don't get me wrong Zak is great, but Oasis where great before him and they will be great after him. and I don't think he wrote any song lyrics for songs (cuz if he did we would have seen it in DOYS)

to do the drums

_________________

I dont think he will bother with a solo album until Oasis call it a day. Liam could even do one in his older age also. Then we have the Gallagher kids that might turn to music. I think we are sorted until most of us die to get an Oasis related fix.

izzynoel wrote:

I dont think he will bother with a solo album until Oasis call it a day. Liam could even do one in his older age also. Then we have the Gallagher kids that might turn to music. I think we are sorted until most of us die to get an Oasis related fix.

thats what i'm saying Liam, Gem and Andy could make their own album together if Noel does his own!

_________________

i would hate it if noel wouldn't stay in oasis and put 100% in oasis music; if he left, it wouldn't be oasis anymore. but if he were to do a solo album, after oasis call it a day, i'm sure it would be brilliant. but i wish oasis would go on as it is.